BigLaw Starting Salaries Increase Again

BigLaw salaries have risen again. After Milbank increased first-year associate salaries to $215,000, at least one law firm not only matched the increase but actually exceeded it. As the author of the article linked above explains, more of the top law firms may still choose to increase first-year associate pay to ensure they remain competitive recruiters.

As of this past summer, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz was paying first-year associates $220,000 and approximately 70 other law firms, mostly in the top 100 by size, were paying their first-year associates $215,000.

Technical Glitches Yet Again for the LSAT

Technical glitches beset the LSAT once again this month. This time, it impacted both the online and in-person test takers. LSAC spokesperson Mark Murray stated the test went down for 10 to 15 minutes just after noon on Friday and at least several hundred students were impacted. Murray explained, “While this is a different issue than what occurred in August, it’s not acceptable. We understand how it affects test takers, and we’re deeply sorry it happened.”

In the end, all test takers received the full allotment of time. We hope the LSAC gets these issues resolved. In the meantime, we will continue to advocate the in-person test option whenever it is convenient. We firmly believe those students should have been a bit more relaxed knowing the issue was being witnessed and documented by the proctor as well as the other students in the room and did not have any “what if it’s only me?” concerns.

It will be interesting to see what happens to the GRE’s market share if these technical issues aren’t fixed as soon as possible.

Law School Financial Aid Consideration

Five law schools reached a $2.9 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) after making 92 ineligible loans to LL.M students. The schools are Albany Law School, Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School, Brooklyn Law School, New England Law–Boston, and New York Law School. All five are “stand-alone” law schools, meaning they are not affiliated with universities.

The DOE requires federal student loans only be distributed to students in programs recognized by the schools’ accreditation agencies. In the case of these law schools, that is the American Bar Association (ABA). However, the ABA only accredits JD programs and not LL.M. programs. As a result, these schools should not have been offering federal student loans to their LL.M. students.

We want to be unequivocally clear. We have nothing against stand-alone law schools per se. We recognize LL.M. students, in particular, generally have stronger ties to their home area than JD students. It’s certainly feasible a stand-alone school may be the only viable option for many LL.M. applicants.

What we want is for prospective applicants to consider this a valuable learning opportunity. So if you are considering a LL.M., you may want to make sure you carefully consider your financial aid options if you do choose a stand-alone law school.

Demand for in-person LSAT skyrockets

This month’s hybrid LSAT didn’t exactly go as well as the LSAC had hoped. Just over 60% of test takers opted for the online version and there were many reported issues with the online test. The most common we have heard from our clients was being locked out of the test. Some test takers also reported issues with proctor communications. Over 2,500 test takers opted to retake the exam this weekend with 70% selecting the in-person option.

Additionally, the deadline for choosing between the online and in-person formats for the September LSAT was extended to Thursday, August 31. Earlier indications are that in-person registrations for the September LSAT will greatly exceed the number of online registrations. We strongly encourage everyone reading this blog to take the LSAT in person if it is at all possible for them given their particular circumstances. We expect the LSAC to eventually get all of the August issues resolved, but it could take a while and we don’t want anyone to underestimate the effects worries (real or imagined) about technical snafus could have on their test scores.